Discussion about this post

User's avatar
BITFORM's avatar

BITFORM | Forecast Accuracy Ranking — Bitcoin Week of Aug 11–17, 2025

What this is

The Decoder Review is not just a self-audit of BITFORM. To be meaningful, accuracy must be placed in context. That’s why every week we compare BITFORM’s structural forecasts with other major voices — institutional research desks, Substack analysts, on-chain specialists, and media narratives.

The methodology is simple:

Scored 1–10 based on alignment with market reality

Evaluated on levels, triggers, flows, and scenarios

Only forecasts published before or during the week are included

Market Reality Recap

BTC opened near $121.7K, tested $124.2K on Aug 14 after CPI, then slid back to close ~$117–118K.

Range extremes: $116.9K low ↔ $124.2K high.

ETF inflows net +$1.05B but concentrated in IBIT.

Macro soft CPI gave risk-on impulse; rally faded into re-range.

🎯 Forecast Accuracy Ranking

1. Bitcoin Vector Lite (Willy Woo) — 8.8 / 10

Saw speculative rallies through short squeezes as the dominant mechanism.

Called microstructural fragility accurately, especially around $124K.

Weakness: less breadth/macro integration.

2. BITFORM (Florian Jumel) — 8.6 / 10

Defined clear scenario fork: CPI → break >$118.5K on inflows vs <$116K on outflows.

Delivered trigger discipline: no sustained breakout without breadth & persistence.

Edge: False-break shield at $125K preserved capital.

Weakness: Breadth codification not yet fully hardwired.

3. Glassnode — Market Pulse — 8.5 / 10

Strong on on-chain caution: profit levels high, volumes weak.

Correctly doubted durability of the breakout.

Weakness: Fewer actionable levels, more descriptive than executable.

3. K33 Research — Ahead of the Curve — 8.5 / 10

Precise structural ranges: $122K retest → $117K gap fill.

Delivered the week almost point-for-point.

Weakness: Lacked conditional triggers and flow gating.

4. Bitcoin News Digest (Mike Richardson) — 8.6 / 10

Highlighted key resistance levels and ATH retest potential.

Caught the push into $123–124K.

Weakness: Less emphasis on ETF breadth; more static than dynamic.

5. ecoinometrics — 8.4 / 10

Captured ETF inflow recovery narrative.

Weakness: No structural scenarios or trigger mapping; analysis more thematic.

6. Adler’s Insights (Axel Adler Jr.) — 8.0 / 10

Framed the $118K compression zone well.

Weakness: Missing flow conditions, no multi-scenario compass.

7. Kaiko Research — 8.2 / 10

Correct macro rationale (Fed cut pricing, softer USD).

Weakness: Overweighted rebound narrative; no re-range bias.

8. Mitrade Weekly Forecast — 8.2 / 10

Predicted: spike → unwind to ~$118.8K.

Accurate shape, but published after CPI → reactive timing.

9. Bitfinex Alpha — 8.0 / 10

Warned breakout durability was questionable.

Weakness: lacked full scenario set; intuition over structure.

10. Media Layers

Cointelegraph (7.8 / 10): flagged CPI & $117K gap, lacked precision.

CoinDesk (7.5 / 10): CPI fork, over-weighted downside hedge.

Barron’s (7.5 / 10): bullish macro tailwinds, upside targets missed.

Zerocap (7.2 / 10): thematic, not tactical.

🧭 Decoder Verdict

Upper Quartile: BITFORM (8.6), Glassnode/K33 (8.5), Willy Woo (8.8).

Second Tier: Richardson (8.6), ecoinometrics (8.4), Adler (8.0), Kaiko/Mitrade (8.2).

Lagging: Bitfinex Alpha (8.0 but less structured), media (7.2–7.8).

Forecast accuracy isn’t about being right, it’s about defining risk with precision.

The false-break at $124K–125K was the test.

Most narratives leaned bullish, but without hard flow gates.

BITFORM’s discipline meant no chase, no trap.

The upgrade path is clear:

Codify ETF breadth and persistence rules

Refine time-decay resets

Keep scenario forks event-driven, not opinion-driven

Expand full comment

No posts